Edwin de Nies wrote: Typical “bushist”-replies: if you’re against Wilders than you must be for radical Muslims.
I wonder who said that - I don't see it here. Perhaps I've overread it. But how you should understand it: If you want to prevent this movie from showing, before you even know whats in it, then you are for cencorship. I can not take your side on that.
We have to ask why you do it. One reason that we can read here, is that it might get Dutch or Europeans in danger. But IMO thats the price we have to pay for our freedom. If we back down, then their tactics of intimidation and violence worked.
The second argument you see a lot is that he is insulting religion. IMO most religions have to at least allowed to be thouroughly evaluated and argumented against. Especially if so much violence comes from it. Christians obviously can deal with that evaluation much better - so why create a double standard for the extremist Muslims? Their violent reaction to things like mere carricatures is ridicules: stupid and barbarian.
The last argument I've seen is that Wilders movie is something like Hate-Speech and Nazi Propaganda. Things like that are forbidden - and Wilders said that movie would not break a law. And judging from what I heard from him so far, I think we can believe him. But first of all: It's not even out yet, so you can't and should not judge it before you seen it. Sounds obvious to me.
Btw: Thanks Drew :)